Hitting The New Retweet Button

This morning I found I was in the latest round of Twitter beta testing, for the new retweet functionality within the twitter.com page.

I like experimenting, so I spent a few minutes trying it out and seeing how it worked.  Inside the web page version of Twitter, it works fantastically, now sitting next to the reply link.  However, it's when you look at things from a third-party client that you notice its functionality is still limited.

None of the new retweets works on Tweetdeck For iPhone or mobile Tweetie 2.  You don't get anything.  Full stop (Australia)/period (US).

I had been expecting at least SOMETHING to make it out to the third-party clients, even if it wasn't identical to that on the web page.  I'm told, though, that the retweet API hasn't been set up for outside the page.  Third-party client developers will have to upgrade their apps to use this new retweet API.

For the meantime, I can only recommend using this new retweet link/button for non-essential information.  If your followers don't use the web page, they won't see anything you send through this mechanism yet, a huge drawback if using retweets for emergencies.

On the other hand, if you're using the web version of Twitter, you will see the new symbol to signify this new item, the name of the person being retweeted and their message in its full entirety.  Underneath this you'll see the name of the person retweeting, or the numbers of people passing the original message on.  If you're posting to someone whose web version isn't part of the beta, instead of the new symbol they'll see 'RT.'

This new system does not do away with our normal retweeting method.  It's still very functional and still quite an option.

Having both methods allows great choice of method, though, until the beta moves a bit further along and developers access the retweet API, the original method is still better for urgent/important/emergency retweets.

While I like this new way, I'm more looking forward to when I can see a retweet from my web version making it to my Tweetie 2.  Then it's going to be a heck of a lot more useful.

Posted via email from @Geehall1:

It Wouldn’t Be Windows Without A Silly Glitch

While Windows 7 is quite an improved little beast, it's the annoying glitches that dent the experience.

I put Windows 7 Home Premium on my Macbook the day Win7 was released, via Parallels 4/5.  

For the most part it's been a reasonable OS, though it hasn't exactly made me think it's better than OS X or Linux.  The one thing that has made me grumpy is that the boot screen no longer shows the new Windows animation coming towards me.  Instead, I'm seeing Vista's green progress bar.  That's, what, merely a few weeks of use?

Some quick searching via Google shows I am not alone.  This seems to be a common experience for users of Windows 7.  The causes seem be something to do with the locales and there is a fix  for it.  If you use an elevated command prompt with Administrator rights, you simply use bcdedit or bcdboot.

I tried that and got my favored boot screen back for just one time.

Admittedly, this is a really small thing that hasn't greatly impacted on my use of Windows 7.  It's just plain irritating as I never used Vista and can't see the sense in this happening.  It just makes me wonder if, a few months down the line, something else will revert unexpectedly.

While it was good having a WIndows here on the Macbook, it really needs to stand out.  The competition is now nipping at Microsoft's heels and in some cases surpassing it, so stupid things such as this bootup glitch are going to have a greater impact.  Less users will tolerate things that detract from their productivity and computing enjoyment.  After all, who wants to spend an hour or two searching the net for an answer that only works for one restart.  If we want to do that, Linux gives us greater control and satisfaction for the same amount of work.

At Geehall 1 Episode 16: Tweetupmellers/Twums 7.5

via youtube.com

The name Tweetupmellers indicates a Melbourne-based tweetup…but we’re open even to our tweeps from South Australia and New South Wales. Some of our interstaters make it to the main monthly Twums…but others’ schedules don’t allow for that. So we have a MINI-Twums.

Last night (November 12, 2009), we held a mini-Twums to welcome @AndrewBlanda. We also introduced him to a uniquely-Tweeupmellers custom…the Twums Interviews.

Newspaper first to go live with public Google Wave | Media Owners | Revolution

Newspaper first to go live with public Google Wave

Staff, revolutionmagazine.com, 03 November 2009, 2:30pm

 

LONDON – Following the hype around the launch of Google Wave, German newspaper Welt Kompakt has become one of the first to launch a public Wave, helping readers interact with the title.

 

The first public Waves have gone live

The newspaper, which styles itself as the ‘little sister’ of national daily Die Welt, is thought to be the first on Google Wave, using the real time service to interact with its readers.

It already has a presence on Facebook, YouTube and Twitter, where it is making use of the new Twitter Lists feature to make more of its content available. This link will take you through to the public Welt Kompakt Google Wave but be warned, it has a lot of messages in it and most of them are in German.

All these efforts are to help the title appeal to young readers with lots of money to spend, or “young educated and high-income readers in the cities,” as Jan Bayer, publishing director of Die Welt group, put it. The changes are being advertised in a campaign running across online and offline media.

Tags:  Press,  Germany,  Europe,  Social Media,  National Press,  Media / Entertainment,  Digital,  Die Welt,  Media Owners,  Welt Kompact,  Google Wave

Having just gotten my own Google Wave invite, it’s time to see what’s happening in the Wave world. Here’s the first such look.

From iSnack 2.0 to… (Spredgemite/Spreadgemite, we hope)

In recent months Kraft has had a naming contest for the new, cheese-spread version of Vegemite.

However, when the name was finally announced at the AFL Grand Final, iSnack 2.0 didn't go down well with the Australian public.

Today, Kraft issued a statement admitting it had made a mistake with the iSnack name.

Back on July 20th, I started an unofficial campaign on Twitter to see if social media could have a hand in the naming of this product, going with my own personal choice Spredgemite.  There was an alterative spelling of 'Spreadgemite,' but it seemed a bit long.

A few tweets were sent around to my own Twitter circle and even one to Sunrise On Seven's Melissa Doyle.

Tonight, I decided to tweet Melissa to see if she remembered those July tweets.  I got a surprise.  Not only did she remember the tweets, but she thought the name was a cracker (see graphic).

I also had a look on Google to see if there'd been any prior uses of Spreadgemite and Spredgemite before my first hashtag with these names.  Yes, there is a prior mention in June, but it doesn't look like the person in question went much further with it.  I also see some people had entries with these names in the competition.  It would appear, then, that great minds thought alike.

So really, all I can claim is coming up with the first hashtags and the first concerted effort to get it into people's minds.

Kraft will be announcing their plans to replace the iSnack name on October 2, so I'll be sitting back and seeing what they have in mind.  However, I'll still plug away on the Spredgemite/Spreadgemite names because I want to see if social media can have an historic opportunity here.

And if it eventually turns out that Spredgemite/Spreadgemite is accepted?  Well, in one household, there's going to be a family cheering their heads off.

Snow Leopards, Windows 7…And A Linux Or Two

After a couple of weeks of trying out Windows 7 Release Candidate, I said hello to an old friend…the infamous “Blue Screen of Death.” That was while trying to get a HP PSC 1350 working with it. The printer, by the way, still won’t work with it…although the scanning part DOES.

 I’ve also gotten the update-only pack for Snow Leopard. I’ve been using that roughly a week. At the same time I’ve read some hilarious stuff about Snow Leopard supposedly being Apples “Vista.”

 I tend to think Windows fanboys are really stretching trying to make such a comparison. Snow Leopard on my aluminium 13″ Macbook is doing quite nicely. So nicely I’m STILL enjoying working with a Mac. Way more than I ever enjoyed various flavors of Windows over the years.

 In the difficulty stakes…I had Fedora 10 Linux installed into Virtualbox and used the Additions iso to get a screen size bigger than 800×600. Unfortunately, due to something that’s probably more traceable to that Virtualbox Additions part, my Fedora log-in screen has some video corruption where everything is bunched up and where there’s three login dialogues through all the haze.

 Now, before Linux detractors start whingeing…all I have to do is a blind login. I hit the return key, I type in the password. Bingo. Fedora core desktop with NO video corruption. The solution or workaround was found on the net within a couple of minutes.

 The one thing I most like about Linuxes is that a solution to any problem or difficulty is only a Google away. There’s also the fact the next iteration of the particular Linux will usually have the glitch corrected. If not in the next iteration, then in a custom or branched kernel.

 Apple OS X is enjoyable to use and has ALWAYS been very user-friendly. Linux has a higher learning curve than Windows or Apple OS X, but gives you the ability to master your system’s glitches every easily. The learning curve also produces greater satisfaction and a new skill.

 Then there’s Windows.

 Bill Gates did make his millions in the after-care associated with Windows. At the end of the day, however, the need for such after-care has always been an impediment to true computing productivity.

 Would NASA or the military use Windows? Not for anything mission-critical. A blue-screen fault in any of NASA’s computers in any of their space missions would waste millions of dollars. We’ve also all seen that South Park episode where a general running a war games simulation on Windows gets more than cheesed at Bill for Windows going down at a crucial time.

 In Windows 7, the blue-screen fault should have been long gone.

 Then there’s printer drivers. Would someone at Microsoft care to explain to me why I can get my printer working on Mac AND Linux with minimum fuss? Heck, a simple PPD file for the Linux and the printer is up and running, while on some other Linuxes it’s automatically working the moment it’s plugged in. Seriously, there is a really decent printer driver and software for OSX 10.5 AND Snow Leopard.

 The thing now is that everything runs on Intel hardware. It’s equal terms. Now it’s a real competition. So Microsoft now has to actually prove itself a bit more.

 Vista flopped because they didn’t get it right. While they’ve improved things in Windows 7, I’ve seriously got to ask why there are still blue-screen faults. All the money Microsoft makes and they still can’t get rid of it?

 So the current verdict is: I’ll still leave Windows 7 inside Virtualbox and only use it when I absolutely have to. If it can’t work properly on a Mac, if it can’t work properly on the virtual hardware specs for Virtualbox, why should I put it on any non-Mac computer?

 Just to make Microsoft rich? Not enough reason. Just because it has so much market share? Still doesn’t make it the best OS. Because they ask me nicely? Well, IF they get rid of that blue-screen fault AND get a printer driver going for my little printer…maybe.

 If I’m going to do things on a computer, eventually turning a buck for my online efforts, I don’t want an OS that impedes my workflow and productivity. Time spent solving a problem that shouldn’t be there will always cost money that could have been better spent elsewhere.

 Macs are great for productivity because they work and work well. Linuxes may have their slight difficulties, but when you want mission-critical, you can’t beat them.

 End of story.

 Less hype, more actual real work really giving us an OS that works better, Microsoft. And stop trying to tell me Snow Leopard is as bad as Vista. A few small problems in old point-releases of some obscure program doesn’t a Vista make.

 My Snow Leopard has purred for the past week or so. Every program works. Again, end of story.

Virtualizing Windows 7

I'm told the one piece of hardware a Windows installation works perfectly on is an Intel Mac.

Imagine the irony of that.

This week, my budget finally stretched far enough to get a 13" MacBook and one of the first things I did was download VirtualBox to it.  Then, since Windows 7 Release Candidate is on the cover DVD of every local computer magazine, I put that inside a VirtualBox virtual machine.

I also put a couple of Linux distributions in sandboxed virtual machines too.

It's a bonus of even Macs running on X86 Intel powered hardware.  Everything can be virtualized on the same machine and you can experiment to your heart's content with any OS you want.

VirtualBox sets up the necessary requirements for each VM via a wizard.  You specify the amount of memory you want the VM to run, the size of the virtual hard disk, set a few more small parameters and then start up your VM.

So I'm really enjoying seeing a Windows sitting inside a Mac program.  Considering the Release Candidate becomes useless sometime around June 2010, it's better being used this way.  No need to dual-boot it with anything, no need to redo everything for a clean install of the full release.  As it is, after March 1, 2010, the RC will shut down every two hours.

If you use a similar method to me and get the RC from a magazine DVD, you have till October 31 to get a product key from Microsoft.

So what do I think of Windows 7?  Well, I missed out on Vista, so it's a huge jump for me.  Very different, perhaps a little less intuitive than previous models.  That's saying a lot for someone who's learnt computers by self-teaching and intuiting.

I like some of the customization and theming, though I'd love to change the taskbar color.  I like the circular Start button and the gadgets (clock, weather, calendar).  I'm especially fond of the new Wordpad, a way more functional version than that previously seen.  Most of the Control Panel is relatively easy to work out.  However, it's still such an alien creature compared to my netbook's Windows XP.  I figure I'll be spending quite a few weeks exploring it before I'll consider myself comfortable with it.

I've read in one of the magazines that a lot more thought went into Windows 7.  Where Vista shipped still waiting for some features to integrate with what was already done, nothing went into Win7 unless it was already finished.  More say by engineers, less by managers.  More thought, more planning, more cohesive.

So, theoretically, it should be a good Windows version.

Then again, I'm still making sure it stays trapped inside my Mac until I'm absolutely sure of that.

Alternatives Make Things Interesting Again

Last week wasn't my favorite time in social media.

Twitter had momentarily lost its gloss, what with DDoS problems, spammers and the usual problems of scaling.  Friendfeed, one of the best social media services, had been sold to Facebook.

It ended up being my quietest week, not just for Twitter, but also for any of my blogging.

On the other hand, like a few Friendfeed users, I spent the time looking at replacements for FF in the eventuality it was one day shuttered.

What I discovered were a batch of new tools which have made for a productive couple of days, even if they don't quite fulfil Friendfeed's esteemed role.

Google Reader is providing a whole heap of news items I can post to Twitter or Friendfeed.  Storytlr gives me a way to aggregate my whole social media lifestream. Streamy gives me some extra news items and a small amount of aggregation.  Finally, the up-and-coming Tumbler brings up a whole new set of options.  It's all got me doing something different from my tweets on Identica. And blogging is back on track with this being my second post in as many days.

So what seemed a bad week became a new opportunity to explore and find something of benefit.

I've noted that a few friends over on Friendfeed have been making similar discoveries.  Google Reader is attracting a few fans amongst the Friendfeeders.

Most of us are still hoping Friendfeed remains in some form or another, because it's still light-years ahead in a lot of ways.  We're prepared if it's not, but it's not like many are suddenly giving up on FF.  It's that good a service that it still provides some great features we're loathe to give up on.

However, only time will tell.

Alternatives to Friendfeed

This week brought the news that Facebook had acquired the Friendfeed founders and their expertise, though it raised the possibility that FF itself would eventually be shuttered.

It's kind of sad, because Friendfeed as a service is a vast improvement on Twitter, done better, scalable and primed for growth.

On the other hand, it may make for some interesting improvments to Facebook itself.

Friendfeed users have been looking at alternatives, though in real terms Friendfeed has been light-years ahead of the rest.

Is Google Reader an alternative?  Well, you can add a lot of your Twitter feeds into it, those of your followers or those you youself follow, as well as any news feed.  On the other hand, it's not as if it comes with a readymade, strong network of friends.

It is still very good for aggregating what you want, then sending items to all your social media services.  It allows for custom "send to" links and even "save to PDF."  It doesn't really seem that good at building a network of friends and followers like Twitter and Friendfeed can.

Look to Google Reader mainly as a way of piping interesting news items to your other social media, but not for an easy way of networking.

Then there's Streamy.

This service was "blessed" early in the week as an alternative to Friendfeed, resulting in a major increase and load on its infrastructure.  The service was caught a bit by surprise with this.

It enables you to have a tabbed look at your various social media, as well as news items it has categorized.  Again, however, you have to bring a readymade network to it.

I consider it as having potential, but I can see it also having a few minor drawbacks as well.  I'd consider it still a stage or two away from being a true Friendfeed replacement.

In the past few hours I've heard of Storytlr, which is a nice little aggregator and lifestreaming service.  As yet I can't see how friends, followers or networks are made in it, but I do see it as enabling the archiving of your Twitter stream.

Stories in Storytlr are what I'm looking at and experimenting with at the moment.  My only complaint with the Story mode is that it burdens the user with an extra click and page, although it enables you to put together a series of tweets or other updates from elsewhere in a titled theme.  In addition, it still allows for standard posts, links, images, audio and video.

It's themable, too.

I'd have preferred Friendfeed being sold to someone who'd kept the site and its features intact, because it still works fantastically in its current form.  While these alternatives cover some of the features of FF, they don't really do all the things at once.

We'll have to see what happens over the next few months.  By then we'll also have a better idea of how these other alternatives rise to the challenge.

I'd still like to see Facebook keeping Friendfeed running, though I won't hold my breath on that.

DDoS Attack Aftermath

Image courtesy of Ed Wheeler

A lot more is known after Thursday's DDoS attack on Twitter, Facebook and Livejournal.

It is now confirmed that the attack was directed against Georgian blogger Cyxymu.  He himself blames the Kremlin for the attack.  Russian officials were unavailable for comment on this.

Cyxmu himself apologized for what happened, even though he was a victim of all this himself.

Meantime, Twitter is still experiencing problems.  Attacks still continued into Friday, with the intensity and nature of attacks shifting.

In an LA Times interview, Twitter's service provider explained why Twitter was so vulnerable to the DDoS attacks.

Interestingly, the non-tweeting world thought it hilarious that Twitter users had nothing to do while the DDoS attack occcurred.

• Previous posts on this topic:  DDoS Attack Hits Various Social Media Services